Mapping every audit finding to the right IFS Food or BRC requirement takes hours of quality expertise. The ERHA pipeline reads the report, proposes the placement, re-checks ambiguous cases and returns a deliverable ready for the action plan.
231
requirements covered across the supported standards
2
standards: IFS Food and BRC Global Standard
min.
per deliverable, where manual placement takes hours
After every audit, the quality team re-reads the report finding by finding to attach each deviation to the right requirement, out of hundreds with overlapping wording. It is expert work, repetitive and time-consuming, and it delays the corrective action plan the certification body expects.
ERHA turns that work into supervision: the pipeline reads the report, identifies the deviations, proposes a placement for each and flags ambiguous cases instead of deciding alone. Every placement is traced: you always know why a deviation is attached to a requirement.
The 5 ERHA steps applied to the audit report: from file drop to placement table.
You drop the audit report into your dedicated space.
The pipeline isolates the findings and builds the standard's context.
Each deviation is attached to the relevant IFS or BRC requirement.
Doubtful cases are re-processed and marked for human validation.
The placement table is returned, ready for the action plan.
IFS Food and BRC Global Standard, 231 requirements in total. The pipeline is built to take on other quality standards; tell us about yours during the demo.
A deviation with an uncertain placement is never decided silently: the pipeline re-processes it, then flags it explicitly for your quality expert to arbitrate. You validate, the deliverable is updated.
A structured, directly usable table (xlsx export): deviation, attached requirement, placement justification, review status. Everything needed to build the action plan without re-entry.
We'll show you ERHA on your own use case, in 20 minutes.